Problems for the United States?

China's Growing Thirst for Oil
Remakes the Global Market

Beijing's Buying Keeps Prices
High -- and Could Reshape
Politics of Middle East
By PETER WONACOTT, JEANNE WHALEN and BHUSHAN BAHREE
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


With its factories working overtime, and its consumers on course to buy almost two million cars this year, China is developing a world-class thirst for oil. And its hunt for steady supplies is reshaping the global energy market, the environment and world politics.

China -- which this year surpassed Japan as the No. 2 petroleum user after the U.S. -- is increasing its oil purchases even faster than it is pumping up its brawny economy. Imports for the first 10 months of 2003 are up 30% from the year-earlier period. The International Energy Agency expects imports to double to some four million barrels a day by 2010. By 2030, the IEA expects China to be importing about 10 million barrels a day, roughly what the U.S. brings in now. Domestic oil output, meanwhile, is flat.

From Houston to London to Moscow, oil companies are looking to secure market share in China, as China roams the world looking for oil fields to develop. Some fear that China, which doesn't have large strategic reserves of fuel, might grow so desperate for oil that it would battle the U.S. for influence in the Middle East or even trade weapons technology to terrorist states. Others are more optimistic, and think China will realize it has a vital interest in keeping the region stable.

"China is having an incredible influence on energy flows, not just in Asia but on a world-wide basis," Peter Davies, chief economist at BP PLC, told reporters on a recent trip to Russia, from where BP hopes to supply China with Siberian gas. "The whole center of gravity of the world energy market is changing."

So far, the most obvious impact has been on prices. In recent years, China has drawn fire in the U.S. and Japan for exporting deflation, as its factories pump out low-price T-shirts, sneakers, radios and other goods. In the $1 trillion-a-year market for oil, the opposite is happening. This year and next, China is expected to account for about a third of the increase in global oil demand. China's purchases are an important reason OPEC, whose members regulate output to prop up oil prices, has been able to keep oil at or above $30 a barrel for much of this year.

Chinese demand is also making geopolitical waves in the U.S. Last month, the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission, a committee of congressional appointees, debated how China's thirst for oil would affect U.S. access to energy supplies. Last year, the Pentagon reviewed a report on what it would mean for U.S. national security if the Chinese and Saudis grew closer. Saudi Arabia, the world's largest exporter, is negotiating to build a huge refinery in China with Exxon Mobil Corp. The desert kingdom's state oil company has even begun sending students to Chinese universities to get undergraduate degrees and learn the language.


Meanwhile, China's mushrooming fleet of cars is adding to worries about this smokestack nation's impact on the environment. In the next decade, the number of cars on Chinese roads is expected to grow fivefold to 100 million, approaching half of the U.S. total, according to the Development Research Center, a government think tank. China is set to tighten its emission standards by 2005, and in 2008 it plans to introduce standards that could be even tougher than those in the U.S.

"If all our bicycles turn into our cars, that's a horrible figure," says Zhai Guangming, retired director of oil exploration at state-run China National Petroleum Corp. "It would scare the world."

Flip Side

The flip side of growing Chinese oil imports is increasing vulnerability. Used to having leverage over foreign multinationals seeking access to its market, China finds the shoe on the other foot as it is forced to compete with Japan and other buyers for oil. Chinese oil companies -- starting decades behind U.S. and European giants -- are struggling with limited success to acquire stakes in oil ventures overseas.

China is particularly exposed in the Middle East, the source of half its imports, pointing up a little-noted twist: China's energy lifeline is increasingly dependent on the U.S. fleets that guard the world's shipping lanes. Like Washington, Beijing will increasingly need stability in the Middle East to ensure reliable oil supplies at moderate prices. In the long run, this confluence of interests might tug Beijing closer to the U.S. But several analysts warn that China's thirst could lead to Beijing's emergence as a competitor for influence in the Middle East.

"Saudi Arabia could possibly begin looking to the Chinese for those economic, security and political needs it now garners from the U.S.," last year's Pentagon study noted.

Energy security has been gripping Chinese economic planners for years. Government economists long warned about the danger of importing growing amounts of oil because of the foreign exchange it sucked out of the country, and because of the dependence it created on volatile overseas markets. Importing oil stabbed at the heart of Communist Party notions of self-sufficiency.

In the past decade, technocrats concluded China couldn't go it alone. Domestic oil output peaked as demand soared.

China's factories were gobbling up huge amounts of oil. The fuel is the key feed stock for petrochemicals, which the factories use to crank out plastics, mobile phones, toys and computer parts.

At the same time, the Asian financial crisis of the late 1990s brought about vast economic changes that led to increased demand for oil. Like smaller Asian countries, China was overly dependent on exports for growth and exposed to sudden slowdowns abroad. To stimulate the economy, Beijing began investing billions in infrastructure, encouraging bank lending and relaxing curbs on home purchases and auto production to get people spending. The moves sparked explosive sales in apartments and cars -- growth that filtered through the rest of the economy and led to quantum leaps in oil use.

"The only force that could help the economy grow at 8% is consumption," says Ma Xiaoye, a former economic official and now director of Academy for World Watch, a think tank in Shanghai. "We had no choice."

The challenges of fueling that growth are clear outside the capital in the shadows of Cat Ear Mountain, the site of the Beijing Yanshan Petrochemical Co. refinery. It was established in 1968 at the height of the Cultural Revolution, when self-sufficiency was China's watchword. The refinery became an island of industrial stability, expanding output even as political chaos enveloped the nation. Movie theaters, shops, schools and eventually a town sprang up around it. Trucks and later a pipeline solidified a supply link with the huge Daqing field to the northeast, the refinery's lone supplier.

Turning to Russia

These days, output from the Daqing fields is declining. "They are reducing crude-oil production every year," says Chang Jiang, a senior engineer at Beijing Yanshan. "So we are turning to Russia."

In July, the refinery, a unit of China Petroleum & Chemical Corp., or Sinopec, processed its first shipment of oil from Russia, the world's No. 2 exporter. In May, the Chinese and Russian presidents endorsed the idea of building a pipeline to supply Siberian crude to Daqing, which could then be fed to Yanshan. OAO Yukos, Russia's largest oil company, and CNPC, a Chinese oil giant, signed supply pacts promising to send 400,000 barrels of Russian oil a day via the pipeline, slated to be built by 2005. In eastern Siberia, Yukos has stepped up its search for new oil reserves, setting up a camp for surveyors in the tundra.

But Russia may be an unreliable lifeline. Yukos's main shareholder, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, has been jailed amid a political battle with the Kremlin, casting doubt on the company's ability to keep pushing the China pipeline ahead. The Kremlin, meanwhile, has put the China project on hold while President Vladimir Putin mulls an alternate pipeline to Russia's Pacific port of Nakhodka, which has the advantage of being able to supply not only China, but also Japan and other Asian consumers. Japanese Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi is lobbying hard for Nakhodka, pledging billions of dollars to help finance the pipeline. He even brought a judo master to a St. Petersburg summit in January to amuse Mr. Putin, himself a black belt in the sport.

The Chinese are scurrying for other deals. They are pressing for access to reserves in Iran, the second-largest exporter in OPEC after Saudi Arabia. In Iraq, CNPC is hoping the new government will stick by a deal inked in 1997 under which the oil company will develop Iraq's Al-Ahdab oil field. Beijing is pushing forward plans for a multibillion-dollar pipeline from oil-rich Kazakhstan, even amid doubts about the feasibility of the project. During a visit to Kazakhstan in June, Chinese President Hu Jintao signed an agreement to revive a long-delayed pipeline project that would pump oil across the Chinese border.

China's insecurity is making global oil czars nervous. Top on their list of worries: China, unlike other major industrial powers, lacks a large strategic reserve of oil to buffer the country during supply shocks. That gap alarmed the industrial world's energy watchdog early this year. As the U.S. and Britain prepared to invade oil-rich Iraq, officials at the International Energy Agency say they opened a dialogue with Chinese officials. The aim: to preclude panic buying of petroleum by China, which might roil an already-jittery world oil market.

Chinese officials are loath to discuss the politically charged topic of energy security. Oil czar Zhang Guobao -- the 59-year-old vice-minister of a super-agency whose purview includes autos, high-tech and energy -- turned down requests for an interview.

But pieces of a strategy are starting to emerge. The State Energy Administration, which Mr. Zhang also heads, plans to create a strategic oil reserve, but officials won't say how the agency will finance and build the stockpile. By 2005, China plans to store 50 to 55 days' worth of oil imports and 68 to 70 days' worth by 2010, according to Wu Kang, energy analyst at the East West Center in Hawaii.

In Washington, national-security strategists are sorting through a welter of possible consequences of Beijing's oil thirst. The study reviewed by the Pentagon last year, "Sino-Saudi Energy Rapprochement: Implications for U.S. National Security," concluded that the world oil market will be able to accommodate China. The study also predicted that Beijing is coming to share America's interest in ensuring the Middle East remains a reliable supplier of oil.

"We have common strategic needs," says Amy Jaffe, senior energy analyst at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy and one of the authors of the study.

Still, many analysts are wary of a Beijing that could begin to feel boxed in by its energy needs. The study noted that China might emerge as a major arms supplier to the Saudis. Other analysts fear that China might be tempted to trade weapons technology for access to oil in countries such as Libya and Iran.

More than 60 years ago, another emerging Asian power felt squeezed on energy: Japan. The U.S. responded to Japanese aggression in East Asia by imposing a natural-resources embargo on Tokyo, which hit back by attacking Pearl Harbor. Kent E. Calder of Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies says those events point a way forward for China and the U.S. as they seek to head off future conflict.

"Obviously, historical parallels are never exact," Mr. Calder told the congressional commission last month. "Yet Japan's belligerence when it was vulnerable suggests that taking positive steps to support China's energy security can be in America's national interest."

Umm Hello

[ Tue Dec 02, 12:45:23 PM | Drew Pecunia | edit ]
In Heart of Steel Country, Bush Talks of Economy, Not Tariffs

Umm Talk to the hand. Shouldn't we be protecting some of our industries? We all know a country can't run on services alone. Certainly it can not create jobs for its less educated people. Does anyone remember the concept of mercantilism. It is the process by which you keep the colonies dependant on you for all of your goods. Sound familiar? Made in China

Anyone remember when it used to be Democrats that got accused of spending too much. So now we are spending too much, we gave a big tax break, and mortgage refinincings are done. Yet we still have no new jobs being created in the economy. In order to keep unemployment at its current level--not so good--we need to create yes create 60,000 new jobs a month. To encourage the type of boom we had in the 1990's would require 300,000 new jobs to be created every month. This is clearly not the way to do that.

Not all spending is created equal. How do I mean. Well spending by the government on infrastructure--roads, mass transit, ports, construction and the like directly creats decent paying jobs in the construction sector and pays dividends for years to come in side business created from those jobs. Spending on military conflicts in the gulf, interest on the debt and the like creates no tangible long term benefit to the economy.

Not all tax cuts are created equal. Creating a stimulus to the US economy and indeed any economy--with the purpose of creating jobs requires that the tax cuts be targeted at people who will immediately spend the money. The last tax cuts did not achieve this aim -- and therefore no jobs were created. What do I mean? Well, when my parents get a tax cut that money is simply invested for retirement. They have more than enough money coming in every month to cover bills so they invest in bonds or the like. While this makes it easy for business to raise capital--it is not necessarily spent on creating jobs.

Let's try another example. If someone who is just barely getting by--paying for rent, keeping that old car held together with gum and ruberbands, or is just dealing with that old energy hog refrigerator gets a tax cut. Well they replace the car and refrigerator! So they buy that on the economy. The stores make money right away, the factory has to produce more goods, and Americans work. That is assuming that they buy American.

Well what if the entire cylcle I just described had been repeated over and over again by giving the people most in need of a tax cut a cut. The answer is fairly straight forward as I am sure you have guessed. Many people replace their cars, refrigerators, etc. This results in a huge boost to the economy.

So isn't this what we should be doing instead of our current policy? Think logical!
- Drew, 12:42 PM